866-286-5824

How we help

You have many sources for health insurance.  Our primary purpose is to be a problem solver and cut through marketing hype and insurance jargon to find you the best health insurance plan.  We specifically help individuals, families, and small businesses find the best value for your health insurance dollars.

 

Visitor Poll

How much do you think health insurance costs for a 35 year old?
 

Verify Brown Agency Inc, The

Our Blog
Orrin Hatch Utah Talks about healthcare Print E-mail
Written by blair Anderson   
Wednesday, 27 January 2010 09:16

I thought this was weird.... Fox news host Greta Van susteren interviewed Orrin Hatch about the health care plan

This is a rush transcript from "On the Record," January 26, 2010. This copy may not be in its final form and may be updated.

GRETA VAN SUSTEREN, FOX NEWS HOST: Senator Orrin Hatch says President Obama and the Democrats have an arrogance of power and are trying to do something unconstitutional. Senator Hatch went "On the Record."

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

VAN SUSTEREN: Senator, nice to see you, sir.

SEN. ORRIN HATCH, R - UTAH: Well, nice to see you.

VAN SUSTEREN: Senator, there's, of course, the big issue of whether the health care bill will get passed ever and signed by the president. But jumping ahead, assuming that for some reason that it does get passed, even though I know that you're fighting against passing this particular bill, does it have constitutional issues down the road that we ought to be focusing on?

HATCH: Well, it does have serious constitutional issues. Number one, this will be the first time in history that individual citizens in this country will be forced to buy something they may not want. And they may be forced to buy a federal version of something they don't want. You know, the commerce clause has always been used to involve matters involving activities that substantially affect interstate commerce. Well, you can't justify telling people that they have to buy something they don't want.

VAN SUSTEREN: Is there any statute that you know of or legislation where the Congress has told people they must buy something, or anything remotely similar that we can gage this particular legislation against that?

HATCH: They cite everybody has to buy automobile insurance. Well, that is not true. You don't have to drive a car. You can choose not to drive a car. If you drive a car, yes, the state requires you to buy auto insurance. But that's the state, that's not the federal government.


The federal government -- liberty depends upon limitations on the federal government. And that's why the commerce clause has never been used to go so far as to tell people they have to buy something they don't want.

VAN SUSTEREN: I thought with automobile the justification for the insurance is driving is a privilege, not a right, which is why states are able to do that.

HATCH: You said it better than I did. Driving is a privilege. It is a state run situation. If the state requires to you buy automobile insurance, you have to do it. But even then you don't have to drive. You could say I'm not going to buy it. And you have that right as a citizen, that's one of your liberties that you can assert.

If the Congress of the United States mandates that you have to buy insurance policy, health insurance policy, that will be the first time in history the Congress has gone that far.

If they can force to you buy a health policy that they designed or a health policy period, then they can force to you do anything. There would be no limitation on Congress as to what they can for the citizens to do. And the constitution just doesn't give that type of leeway.

VAN SUSTEREN: And you wrote an op-ed piece that appeared in the "L.A. Times" where I say it, and you also talked about the tax issue, whether or not there can be a disparity in the excise tax and whether that would be a possible challenge should this bill get passed.

HATCH: Well, the excise taxes have to be applied uniformly.

VAN SUSTEREN: By the constitution?

HATCH: By the constitution and by the interpretations ever sense by the Supreme Court. In this particular case, they provide an ability in the bureaucrats to determine about 17 states that might not be as required to pay that Cadillac insurance, and that would be a violation of constitution which requires all excise taxes to be uniform.

VAN SUSTEREN: I knew coming here what your positions were on those constitutional issues.

HATCH: There is other, too.

VAN SUSTEREN: OK, go ahead.

HATCH: There are some others, but let me just mention one other, and that is the cornhusker deal. In other words, they made a deal with the senator from Nebraska that Nebraska would never have to pay its share of the Medicaid costs while every other state does, which means that all 49 other states will have to pay Nebraska's share.

That isn't right either, because that again has to be uniform and it just violates the constitution. It's filled with anti-constitutional principles.

And, frankly, I hope the House does not take the Senate bill. They could and we would be saddled with that doggone thing. I don't think they will. I think there are better thinkers over there about doing that, but if they did we would be stuck with some really unconstitutional approaches towards health care.

VAN SUSTEREN: The reason I was sort of curious, and I've read your op-ed piece, is in the event that you are right on these constitutional issues, it would be enormously difficult or we would have quite a problem in our country should the legislation be passed and then declared unconstitutional.

So it seems to me that those issues to the extent they can be resolved before we get a bill implemented would be quite wise.

HATCH: It would be. And frankly, there are legal experts who differ with me on these items. But people are more and more coming to the conclusion that I'm right on them and that we should not go that far as to impose mandatorily on people healthcare principles or healthcare costs they don't want to pay.

VAN SUSTEREN: We can't get an advisory opinion on the United States Supreme Court. They don't do that kind of thing, so we are treading on new territory on this particular issue.

HATCH: You summed that up well. The Supreme Court does not give advisory opinions, and that's been established law for a long time.

VAN SUSTEREN: All right, so where are we on the health care bill today? If you are a betting man, and you're probably not a betting man, but where is this bill? Is it going to get passed or not?

HATCH: I don't think it is. And frankly the Democrats are saying let's go back and strip it down and start working on it. You can't work on something that has a bad foundation. You can't build a house on a bad foundation. You should just tear down what you have and start over.

And if they would start over on a step-by-step basis, I think there are a number of issues that we could have agreement on where we would work together on those issues.

Right now the Republicans are very upset with what they've tried to foist off on American people. And there isn't a lot of desire to work with them on -- especially on what they've done so far.

But if we started over, went on a step-by-step basis, really worked on things we could agree on, I think we could come up with a healthcare bill that would work pretty well.

VAN SUSTEREN: If the Republican senators are upset, give me the behind-the-scenes color. You walk down the hall and you see for instance Majority Leader Harry Reid. What do you say to him? "Nice day," or "Lousy bill" or what do you say to him?

HATCH: I'm very friendly to Harry and I'm very friendly to everybody else. You can get really irritated with what they do, but that doesn't necessarily mean you attack them personally.

VAN SUSTEREN: But don't you want to collar them into a corner and say let's talk about this? How does it work?

HATCH: I've told a number of them how stupid their approach is.

VAN SUSTEREN: You use the word "stupid"?

(LAUGHTER)

HATCH: Of course. I tell them how ridiculous and stupid some of their approaches are.

VAN SUSTEREN: Their response?

HATCH: They laugh and say tell us how to do it better. I would love to do that.

There are a lot of health care bills that I've worked on that are now law that worked, and I've worked on them in a bipartisan way with Kennedy, with Harkin, with Dodd, with Henry Waxman. Take the act that created the modern generic drug industry, that was Henry Waxman, one of the most liberal people in the whole Congress who I happened to like.

And I like all of the others too, and I can say I would be happy to work with them. But the health committee bill without any Republican input, the Pelosi bill without any Republican input, the Reid bill without any Republican input, including without any real Democrat input.

And then they come to you and say, take it or leave it. That isn't the way you do legislation around here. And it was an arrogance of power. They knew they had 60 votes and felt they could get together 60 votes, which they did, and they didn't need Republicans.

Well, on something that involves one-sixth of the American economy that is this costly and this important and affects every living American, if you pass something on a strictly partisan basis, you know it is a lousy bill.

The Chip bill, we had to fight really hard. It took two years to take care of the Child Health Insurance Program, that was a Hatch-Kennedy bill. And when we got through we had close to 80 votes. It's was a bipartisan vote. Everybody said this is a really good bill and it turned out to be a real good bill as originally written. Now they've distorted that bill.

Because what they want to do is get to a single payer system, and that is socialized medicine, really, by having the federal government dominate everything in health care. If we do that, we have to be the stupidest people on earth. I use that word again, because, in all honestly, we know the federal government and the bureaucrats here in Washington are not going to handle it as well as states.

(END VIDEOTAPE)

 
A H1N1 flu to-do (and don't do) list Print E-mail
Written by blair Anderson   
Tuesday, 13 October 2009 10:09

(Health.com) -- Swine flu vaccines are rolling out this month -- finally. Health-care workers in Indiana and Tennessee were the first to get the nose-spray version, while New Yorkers clamoring for the H1N1 vaccine finally had their chance too.

People with flu-like symptoms such as fever, aches, stuffy nose, and chills, should stay home.

People with flu-like symptoms such as fever, aches, stuffy nose, and chills, should stay home.

However, the onslaught of information about H1N1 -- be it playground rumors, employer signs telling you to cover your cough, memos from your kids' school, or scary-sounding news reports -- is making it pretty hard to figure out what you should be doing right now.

Although some people have already been vaccinated, it could be weeks -- depending on your age and risk factors -- before you even get a chance at the shot (or spray). So now what?

Sometimes it feels like you have two choices. A: Wring your hands endlessly about something over which you have no control. Or, B: Tune out the static and pretend this is all just a horrible dream. (Call it the ignore-the-whole-sorry-mess-until-my-neighbor-is-sick approach.)

Well, guess what? There are a few things you should -- and should not -- be doing at the moment. Here's your guide.

Look up local flu outbreaks.

If you're getting most of your news from the Internet -- and about 40 percent of people say they do -- you may not be up on H1N1 activity in your community.

Take the time to check local flu activity on the online version of your local newspaper (remember those?) or health department, or check out Web sites like Google Flu Trends (though keep in mind that this map is based on search trends and could be skewed if lots of healthy people are searching for information). There's also FluTrends, which is produced by Rhiza Labs, and includes past cases and current activity, or the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) weekly flu update.

If your city or state is a bit of a hot spot, you may need to focus on some of these to-do points sooner than others. The good news is that some of the hardest hit areas in spring -- like New York -- don't seem to have that many H1N1 cases at the moment. (Experts estimate that up to 1 million New Yorkers may have had H1N1 in the spring, which would protect against subsequent infections.)

Don't panic.

For most people, an H1N1 infection is generally mild and can be cured with time, bed rest, and fluids. The virus is serious, though -- particularly for those in high-risk groups. So far this year, 28 pregnant women have died of H1N1, and 76 children died in the spring. "At least two-thirds of [the children] had underlying conditions, which we recognize as putting them at increased risk for complications," says Dr. Nathan Litman, the chief of pediatric infectious diseases at the Children's Hospital at Montefiore, in New York City. High-risk people, whether adults or children, tend to have chronic heart or lung conditions (including asthma), weakened immune systems due to disease or chemotherapy treatment, or diabetes.

That said, H1N1 will feel like seasonal flu for most people. "I'd say at the present time the swine flu looks no more serious than the routine seasonal influenza," says Litman.

Stay home.

Are you sick right now? Say, with flu-like symptoms such as fever, aches, stuffy nose, and chills? Sorry, but it's quite possible you already have swine flu. Experts say that flu activity is higher-than-normal for this time of year and almost all of it is due to H1N1. If you (or your child) are not in a high-risk group, it's best to stay put.

If a child is 2 or older "and has no risk factors for complications and has fever, runny nose, or cough, the best thing to do is to stay home," says Litman. "Plenty of fluids, Tylenol, Motrin, or Advil for fever, and it should run its course on its own." Health.com: How to call in sick without jeopardizing your job

If a child has difficulty breathing, is unable to take fluids, or starts to be less responsive, or after appearing to recover from the influenza develops a fever and starts coughing again, then see a doctor.

If you are pregnant and have flu symptoms, it might be best to call your doctor before going in to see him or her, says Litman. Health.com: 8 Ways swine flu is changing society

"They may want to set up a separate location to be seen or separate times to see sick patients," he says. "You don't want the pregnant woman with influenza who is coughing and sneezing to go into the room with pregnant women who are well and just there to get routine prenatal care."

Understand the risks.

While the symptoms of H1N1 may be no different from seasonal flu, there are some key differences. H1N1 may be easier to catch than regular flu, and younger people may be more likely to come down with it than older people.

"From what I've seen, I actually believe it to be more contagious," says Litman. Often with the seasonal flu that's circulating, a percentage of the population has some immunity to it. With H1N1, it looks like most people -- other than the elderly -- have no immunity to it, and that may be why it appears more contagious, he says.

People who are older than 60 may have been exposed to a swine-flu-like virus in the distant past, which is giving them an edge with this pandemic. That's not to say they can't get sick, but "many of them appear to have immunity from a prior infection with a similar virus or cross reactions with a similar virus that help protect them against the swine flu," says Litman.

Get a seasonal flu shot. The regular seasonal flu shots are available now, and it makes sense to "get the jab" (as the Brits say). While most flu cases happening right now are caused by H1N1, "in two months or three months it may be the regular seasonal flu and we should be prepared for that," says Litman. "Since that vaccine is currently available, I recommend that everyone considered a risk group receive the seasonal flu vaccine." Seasonal flu can be just as dangerous as H1N1; about 36,000 people die, including about 80 children, of seasonal flu every year.

Get a pneumonia vaccine.

What, another shot? For the vaccine wary, this might just feel like one too many pinpricks. However, the pneumonia vaccine, a shot that can help prevent any illness caused by certain types of pneumococcus bacteria, including meningitis and ear infections, may be a good idea too.

The CDC has analyzed H1N1-related deaths and found many people who died had dual infections, including some with pneumococcus. The good news is that if you're up-to-date on your child's vaccines, they probably already have it. Approved in 2001 and called Prevnar, it's routinely given to children.

Another vaccine, Pneumovax, is available for adults, and is recommended for the elderly and those at high risk of infections.

Wash your hands.

Just about every expert is chanting a "wash your hands" mantra. And, in fact, washing your hands with soap and water or using an alcohol rub can help. However, when it comes to flu, just keep in mind that hand-washing may fall into the "can't hurt and may help" category. Because flu virus can hitch a ride on airborne water droplets, you can inhale the virus and get sick even if you wear gloves 24-7 or scrub-in like a brain surgeon. But again, flu viruses can live on surfaces for up to 48 hours. So, yes, wash up. Plus, good hygiene can protect you from other germs, like pneumococcus, which could make a simple case of flu much worse when added into the mix. Health.com: 10 Ways you may be putting yourself at risk for swine flu

Don't stock up on face masks or Tamiflu.

If you're the type of person who hoarded cans of soup and bottled water in 1999 just in case the world ended in 2000, it can be tempting to grab a box of surgical masks "just in case." The CDC and most experts say that's not a recommended or a proven way to prevent infection, although some studies suggest that they can be helpful in homes with a flu-infected family member or when used by hospital workers in place of a N95 respirator.

And while it may seem perfectly harmless to stockpile antiviral drugs, it isn't. If Tamiflu is gathering dust in your medicine cabinet, then people who truly need it may find the pharmacies are fresh out. And the surest route to a drug-resistant flu virus is having people taking it "just in case" or for symptoms that would go away on their own.

Get a swine flu vaccine -- really.

Or at least seriously consider it. Lots of people are not crazy about vaccines in general, and fully one-third of parents say they're going to skip them for their child, according to an AP poll. Understandable. Taking something that could cause side effects, when you feel (or your child feels) perfectly healthy is tough. But keep in mind that if you're thinking about waiting until swine flu is in full force in your community, it may be too late. It can take several weeks after vaccination before your immune system ramps up to full-protection mode. Health.com: Home treatment for flu

If you or your child is perfectly healthy, you can get the nose-spray version, which contains a weakened, but not killed, virus. Unfortunately, if you're in a high-risk group, you may have to wait a bit for the version with killed virus, which is given in shot form. Those should be available in mid- to late-October.

While mulling over your options, try not to think of large federal agencies as faceless giants trying to impose vaccines on you. In fact, such agencies are staffed by scientists and doctors who are trying to protect the public.

"Each year approximately 30 percent to 40 percent of children between 5 and 19 years of age get influenza, that not only keeps them out of school for a few days, but they are also the epicenter of the epidemic -- they spread it to household contacts, other school contacts, and high-risk people in the community, like the elderly -- their grandparents," says Litman. "For their benefit and for the benefit of others, it's wise to get both the seasonal flu vaccine and swine flu vaccine."

Don't let the past haunt you. Although the 2009 virus has been tagged with the unfortunate moniker swine flu (just like the 1976 version), there is a world of difference between the two. For one, they are different viruses. And if you were alive in 1976, you were probably digging the bicentennial, groovy pants, and platform shoes, but your chances of getting swine flu were pretty much nil. (There were roughly 200 cases in Fort Dix, New Jersey, and the virus never spread.) Health.com Swine flu in perspective: Pandemic scares throughout history

Fast forward to 2009, which is truly a pandemic -- there have been more than 340,000 confirmed cases worldwide and nearly 44,000 confirmed and probable cases in the U.S. alone. (The CDC estimates that more than 1 million people have contracted swine flu, but that their cases weren't recorded because they didn't seek treatment.) And the '76 version did have a problem with side effects, including Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), a rare condition in which the immune system attacks nerves, resulting in weakness and even paralysis (although most people eventually recover).

However, the vaccine production used in the 1970s now looks as outdated as your striped bell-bottoms and rockin' sideburns.

"Over the years there have been several improvements in vaccine manufacturing," says Dr. Claudia Vellozzi, the assistant director of the CDC's Immunization Safety Office. "That certainly plays a role in improved vaccine safety now, compared to 1976."

Of the 30 to 40 million people vaccinated for swine flu in 1976, about 1 in 100,000 did develop GBS. However, current research suggests there is little to no GBS risk associated with seasonal flu vaccine.

"There have been one or two studies that showed that if there is a risk, it's very small, or about one in 1,000,000 additional cases of GBS would be attributable to the flu vaccine -- but most studies have not supported any association," she says. (There are 2,000 to 3,000 GBS cases in the U.S. every year, unrelated to vaccines, says Vellozzi. The cause is unknown, but it can be triggered by infections.)

"In terms of our current vaccine, we expect to have a similar safety profile as our seasonal flu vaccine, which has a good track record," she says.

Be prepared.

If you do want to get an H1N1 flu shot, it's best to be patient. It may take weeks before everyone who wants one can get it. In the meantime, think about what you will do if you or a family member does get sick.

"Get immunized, wash your hands, cover your mouth and nose if you're sneezing or coughing, stay home if you're sick, and if any warning signs come up -- difficulty breathing, not responsive as usual, unable to take fluids, or after a day or two of the fever coming down and having more fever and cough again -- see the doctor," says Litman.

Copyright Health Magazine 2009

 
Pawlenty plan would let Minnesotans buy health insurance in other states Print E-mail
Written by blair Anderson   
Tuesday, 13 October 2009 10:05

In a push to rein in soaring health care costs in Minnesota, Gov. Tim Pawlenty today proposed changes to state-run programs that he said will do just that.

Pawlenty said rising costs are "in many respects a runaway train. It's clear we cannot continue on the trajectory we're on."

Among the changes Pawlenty proposed for next year's legislative session would allow Minnesotans to buy their health insurance in other states, which is currently prohibited under state law.

Pawlenty unveiled his plans on the same day a key U.S. Senate committee plans to vote on a massive federal health care overhaul bill.

As the health care debate has roiled Washington, D.C., and the nation at large, Pawlenty has repeatedly criticized the Obama administration's plans and touted Minnesota's track record on health care reform.

He has done so both in his official role as governor and as a Republican critic widely seen as a likely 2012 presidential candidate.

A day before President Obama visited Minnesota in September, Pawlenty sharply criticized Obama's plan, saying it needs to be "less government-centric and more consumer-centric."

Minnesota, he said, has done just that. But despite its relatively low level of uninsured and a quality of care that is the envy of many states, Minnesota has struggled with escalating costs and has scaled back the state's subsidized health care rolls.

Families USA, a national lobbying organization for health care consumers, said today that 45,700 adults in the state lost health coverage during the first eight months of 2009 as a result of losing their jobs.

Pawlenty also proposed that state-subsidized health care programs, MinnesotaCare and Medical Assistance, also be required to use a tiered provider system that he said would reward enrollees be rewarded who choose higher-quality, lower-cost providers.

Written By BOB VON STERNBERG, Star Tribune

Last update: October 13, 2009 - 12:58 PM

Last Updated on Tuesday, 13 October 2009 10:12
 
Big baby initially denied health insurance Print E-mail
Written by LeeAnn Brown   
Tuesday, 13 October 2009 09:14

Colorado parents of a chubby 4-month-old baby were shocked when a health insurance company denied their son coverage.

Alex Lange and his mom Kelli.

Kelli Lange feeds her 17-pound son, Alex, breast milk.

Rocky Mountain Health Plans initially rejected Alex Lange saying he had a "pre-existing condition" of obesity and was therefore a high-risk patient.

Baby Alex is 25 inches long, weighs 17 pounds, and falls into the 99th percentile for height and weight for his age, ABC News reported.

Rocky Mountain insurance underwriters said that it was industry standard to deny coverage to new patients above the 95th percentile. They said the rule includes babies but this was the first time they had ever actually rejected one.

Yesterday, the Denver Post reported that Rocky Mountain Health Plans changed its decision and granted baby Alex coverage.

The boy's mother, Kelli Lange, told the Post that she fed her baby only breast milk and that the insurance company's rejection didn't change how she fed him.

"I could understand if we could control what he's eating," Alex's father, Bernie Lange, a part-time news anchor, told FoxNews. "But he's 4 months old. He's breast-feeding. We can't put him on the Atkins diet or on a treadmill. There is just something absurd about denying an infant [coverage]."

Alex's parents were seeking coverage because their existing insurer had raised rates 40 percent after Alex was born.

Dr. Doug Speedie, medical director at insurance company Rocky Mountain Health Plans, told KKCO-TV/Colorado, it's possible for a baby to be above the 95 percentile and still be healthy, and admitted the system is flawed.

 
borrowed from sfgate.com
Last Updated on Tuesday, 13 October 2009 09:17
 
There are Other Options! Print E-mail
Written by LeeAnn Brown   
Tuesday, 26 May 2009 13:03

 We see people are very surprised to know they can get individual insurance that is LESS EXPENSIVE than their work insurance! In Washington you are required to fill out a questionnaire about your health for the last 10 years, but its well worth the savings. At the least we want to make sure EVERYONE has coverage.  Getting a high deductible plan can save you more heartache than imaginable if something unfortunate were to occur. 

The impacts of going uninsured are clear and severe. Many uninsured individuals postpone needed medical care which results in increased mortality and billions of dollars lost in productivity and increased expenses to the health care system. There also exists a significant sense of vulnerability to the potential loss of health insurance which is shared by tens of millions of other Americans who have managed to retain coverage. This last paragraph came from nchc.org

 

Let us know if we can help

 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 Next > End >>

Page 1 of 2